To the Editor,
Who are representing the taxpayers of
The change in insurance providers has been challenged by the city’s unions to insure that the “equal benefits” clauses in their contracts are honored. Negotiations are underway to resolve issues with fifty four employees with legacy “traditional” policies. Union representatives said that they would challenge the city if even one union member’s contract rights appeared to be in jeopardy. This is as it should be. It is also right and commendable that the Council ensured that the unions were informed and negotiations for “equal benefits” were initiated.
What is not right is for Council Members, however well intentioned, to enter
the negotiations on behalf of union employees using taxpayer money. Council Members
are in effect, holding taxpayers hostage by demanding
$100,000/month ransom until the city can demonstrate to these Council Members
that every union member is happy with their new health insurance policy. The
cost of not switching to the State insurance plan at all would cost taxpayers
over $24,000 per union traditional policy holder. Do these Council Members
really think that this would be a responsible course of action?
Council Members have been quoted as saying that it is worth $100,000 a month for members to be sure of a fair union agreement. That is not their judgment to make because it is not their money they are bargaining with. If the Unions would like to pay the city $100,000 month for more negotiating time, that is a different issue. The resolution for authorization before the Council is necessary to notify the State of the intention to rejoin the system. There would be no immediate affect on employee health care policies, and months to conclude union negotiations.
The fact is, health care and related insurance coverage has
been in crisis for decades in this country. Traditional, unrestricted
medical plans are fast disappearing, no matter who is writing the underlying
coverage. I am a retired union member and have personally been through this
exact situation. I understand the stress
of having to possibly change doctors or benefits. My family is now covered
under the State Health Benefits Plan and looking back, much better off. I have no doubt that the unions and the city
will reach satisfactory agreement.
The cost to taxpayers caused by Council Members continuing
to favor union negotiators over constituents is significant. I recognize that
Bruce Meyer
Chairman, Citizen Budget Advisory Board