"Double dipping",
or the holding of multiple positions is not illegal in New Jersey
as it is in other states, although it should be. Double dipping is common at the state, county and local
level in New Jersey. Far from being insignificant “faults” as the Orange Transcript
described them “double dipping” is a major contributor to
the gridlock and unethical conduct strangling political (and tax)
reform efforts in New Jersey. There are many reasons for concern.
Holding two
elective offices:
• Insulates office holders from political accountability • Frustrates the system of checks and balances among levels of government • Amplifies pork-barrel spending • Blocks the political ladder to emerging aspirants • Reinforces the state’s predilection for localism, parochialism and fragmentation • Creates “low-show” jobs that divide the time and attention of elected officials. • Puts officials in a built-in conflict of obligation situation
While duel
office, or multiple job holding, is technically legal in New
Jersey, reformers have been trying to ban the practice since
the constitutional convention of 1946. The New Jersey Supreme Court in
1961 issued a ruling that threatened the practice, but the Legislature
passed a bill that affirmed it. The current Joint Legislative Committee
on Constitutional Reform recommends eliminating the practice.
Conspicuously
absent from the 23-bill ethics reform package passed by the Legislature
and signed by Gov. James McGreevey in 2004, amidst a public and media
outcry over corruption, was any restriction on dual office holding by
legislators. Assemblyman David Wolfe observed at a hearing of the
Assembly State Government Committee when it considered a resolution to
create a commission to study dual office holding that, “very often…commissions and task forces are good ways to bury issues”
The committee was chaired by Assemblyman Mims Hackett, Mayor of Orange.
From the Democratic Downside of Dual Office Holding by Tom O’Neill, New Jersey Policy Perspective |